Why Department Of State Services Didn’t Bring Nnamdi Kanu To Court – IPOB Leader’s Lawyer

Aloy Ejimakor, the lawyer to the chief of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has acknowledged that the Department of State Services cited “logistics difficulties” as their motive for his or her lack of ability to supply Kanu in court docket for trial.

The IPOB chief’s lawyer acknowledged this in an interview after Monday’s terse trial earlier than Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court who adjourned Kanu’s trial to October 21, because of the failure of the Nigerian authorities to supply him in court docket.

Why Department Of State Services Didn’t Bring Nnamdi Kanu To Court – IPOB Leader’s Lawyer 2

Speaking with SaharaReporters, Ejimakor mentioned, “They (the DSS) gave no valid reason for Kanu not being in court, except to say it lies in their discretion. But the judge disagreed and told them that trial could not commence without the defendant being present.

“The judge also ordered them to grant Kanu’s lawyers access to him twice a week. The matter was adjourned to October 21.

“And considering the impact of the court vacation, the judge indicated that should any issue concerning the case arise during the vacation, we should call the attention of her staff to it so that she can get the permission of the Chief Judge to grant us a hearing unless we don’t mind the vacation judge to hear us. Finally, contrary to expectations, the charges were not amended.

“The motion to transfer him to prison custody was not heard, because the prosecution filed there today in open Court. So, it will be calendared for hearing later.”

When requested whether or not Kanu’s well being may be a motive for his absence in court docket, the lawyer mentioned, “I don’t know. They kept saying things like logistics difficulties,” Ejimakor added.

SaharaReporters had earlier reported that the Federal Government failed to supply Kanu in court docket opposite to an order of the Federal High Court.

A brand new counsel to the federal authorities, Mohammed Abubakar had surprised the court docket when he introduced that Kanu had not been introduced earlier than the court docket.

He had merely introduced that Kanu couldn’t be produced in court docket attributable to logistics causes.

His rationalization sparked off scorching arguments from one of many counsels to Kanu, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, who accused the DSS of irritating efforts by legal professionals and relations to entry the detained Biafra secessionist chief.

Ejiofor had made frantic efforts to maneuver an utility for the switch of his shopper to poison as a greater choice to DSS custody.

He had mentioned, “I was informed authoritatively; I am speaking from the bar that Nnamdi Kanu has been taken out of jurisdiction of this court. We have been denied access to Kanu in the last 10 days. We are worried about his safety and don’t know why the Federal Government refused to bring him in court.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Why Department Of State Services Didn’t Bring Nnamdi Kanu To Court – IPOB Leader’s Lawyer

Send this to a friend